Quantcast
Channel: SINdie
Viewing all 777 articles
Browse latest View live

ShoutOUT!: Last chance to see film doctors at the Armernian Clinic

$
0
0
Like how we recommended a Singapore film for every occasion when the year started, the is a film for every problem too! Your job sucks? Early mid-life crisis? Heart stolen or broken? Come see a film doctor at the Armenian Clinic.
 
Armenian Clinic is a free weekend clinic for all ages that prescribes films as alternative medicine for the soul. Ten Singaporean filmmakers are serving as shrinks-in-residence to treat your various crises.
 
Each filmmaker will prescribe a healing film during an individual and personalised consultation. The clinic also features an in-house dispensary with state-of-the art therapy stations so you can watch your prescribed film right away. Even the set up of the venue reminds you of old-school clinics in Singapore, yet the organisers have also created a space cosy enough for the consultation to take place.
 
The Armenian Clinic was initiated by Selene Yap, The Substation programme manager, and Jeremy Chua, local screen writer and film producer.
 
The Armenian Clinic is open on Thursday and Friday from 6pm to 9pm, and Saturday and Sunday from 12pm to 8.30pm. This is its last week. You can book the one-to-one therapy sessions from its website www.ahomeforthearts.org/armenian-clinic-main
 
The upcoming therapy sessions are with filmmakers Sherman Ong and K Rajagopal this weekend.
 
 

Production Talk - Yessi, 'Lulu the Movie' finally opens this week!

$
0
0
There were not just one PRC lady in big curls and leopard prints, but two, at the press conference (picture below) of ‘Lulu The Movie’. Lulu brought her sister Roo Roo, played by popular local TV host Pornsak, along as the emcee. Sometime towards the end, after the reporters had their fill of the actors’ relentless role playing and hamming it up, Roo Roo broke out of character into Pornsak and made a point about how director Michelle Chong had outdone herself, putting this movie together and making it in a directors’ circle dominated by males. Then, visibly moved by what was said, she started sliding her fingers across her heavily-coloured eye-lids, in an attempt to save her make-up from her tears.
 
It was a strange moment that saw Michelle straddling between the titular persona of the film and her identity as a director; between hiding behind her character as a professional and yet revealing a more vulnerable side to this ‘Superwoman’ the public has come to associate her with.

Indeed, it is no secret Michelle is every bit the ‘Superwoman’. She wrote, produced, directed, acted and did many other things for her labour of love ‘Lulu The Movie’. Behind-the-scenes videos (such as this one) shared on Facebook reveal Michelle in schizophrenic energizer-bunny mode, switching between her role as actor and director, shuffling between the monitor and being in front of the camera. This mirrors her debut feature film project ‘Already Famous’ in which she also two-timed in front and behind the camera as care-lare-fare actress Zann and first-time director Michelle Chong. This might just be her inevitable destiny, because due to her inimitable talent for putting on so many roles, audiences are not content with just having her sit behind the camera.
The idea for ‘Lulu The Movie’ seemed an inevitable consequence of the popularity of ‘Lulu’ the character Michelle has created on TV comedy programme The Noose. Much of the popularity of The Noose has been headlined by Michelle due to memorable characters she has created like Barbarella the SPG, Leticia the Filipino maid and others. Early-stage plans saw Michelle having to decide between doing a film on everybody’s favourite Ang Moh chasing SPG and Lulu. Lulu was chosen subsequently because the interest in PRCs was evidently higher given their presence in Singapore. 
 
'Lulu The Movie’ is a comedy about a determined Chinese lady named Lulu who comes to Singapore to meet her online lover, but after being disappointed by what he turns out to be, she decides to make it on her own and succeeds in becoming an international fashion icon and mogul.
 
Lulu arrives in Singapore from her hometown in China looking for her one true love that she met on social media. However, her dream lover turns out to be the complete opposite of what she imagines him to be. Not wanting to 'lose face' to her friends back in China, she decides to stay in Singapore and make something of herself.
The film follows her adventures of job-hopping, learning English and being discovered by the TV station. She gets the opportunity to front an English fashion program despite having 'unique' fashion sense and even more unique command of the English language. She refuses to conform to normal standards of what a fashion host is supposed to dress or sound like but audiences love her unconventional way of hosting and her show becomes top-rated, even garnering international attention. Her real adventures begin as she embarks on her journey around the world (from London to Shanghai) as a bona fide fashionista. She even meets fashion designer Karl Lagerfeld (well not the real one, but one played by the Flying Dutchman, aka Mark van Cuylenburg - photo on the right). Throughout her journey, although she meets with mockery, discrimination and tough times, Lulu refuses to give up or compromise. A strong message that comes across in the movie is that one can achieve success by staying true to oneself and living life on one's own terms.

With the entire film costing about $1.5 million, production for Lulu was stretched over three and a half years. All that was being juggled with her ‘bread and butter’ activities of writing, producing, directing and acting for The Noose. Being cautious with certain sensitive issues in the plot also required more time and prolonged the process. In addition, Michelle starred in another movie last year - ‘Our Sister Mambo’, in which she played one of four unmarried daughters in a household.

Being somewhat a mockumentary in the likes of ‘Borat’ and ‘Bruno’, interacting with strangers in various locations brought both laughs and struggles to Michelle and the compact production team that followed her. The greatest challenge faced in the overseas portions of the production was finding people who are game enough to be interviewed on camera by someone who clearly does not look or sound like a fashion host but claims she is one. When ‘Lulu’ was in Shanghai, she asked a Caucasian tourist, "Do you speaka Engalishi?", she replied, "Yes I do. Do you speak English?" Thankfully, this and many other interesting encounters with strangers (and numerous security guards!) have been included the movie!

Distribution-wise, its Singapore and Malaysia run have been confirmed. Audiences in Singapore can satisfy their Lulu cravings tomorrow onwards (24 Nov) while Malaysian audiences can watch it 1 Dec onwards. Discussions are currently happening with distributors from Taiwan, London, Hongkong, China and Japan.

Rounding off our conversation with Michelle, we asked her, if they could speak to each other, what would Lulu say to Michelle Chong and what would Michelle say to Lulu?

Lulu would say to Michelle: 庄米雪算什么卡?老娘才是大明星!(Who is Michelle Chong! This queen is the real star!)
 
Michelle would say to Lulu: Your hair gives me a huge headache.

Interview by Jeremy Sing

***
Here is the official trailer of the movie:
The official trailer was launched on 29 September 2016 on Facebook, and has gone viral with 1.5 million views, 19,000 shares and a reach of more than 3 million people.

Keep up with the movie on its Facebook page here: https://www.facebook.com/LuluTheMovie/

Catch ‘Lulu the Movie’ in cinemas islandwide now!

ShoutOUT!: Viddsee partners Singapore Film Commission in new SG Film Channel

$
0
0
Home-grown online entertainment channel Viddsee launched a new Singapore Film Channel with the support of the Singapore Film Commission (SFC), part of the Info-Communications Media Development Authority (IMDA). This was announced at the opening of the Singapore Media Festival yesterday. The channel, which goes live today, is dedicated to showcasing diverse and unique stories from home-grown filmmakers. The partnership is part of SFC’s efforts to cultivate greater awareness and appreciation for Singapore films.

Up to 30 short films will be curated for the channel, which will feature works by up and coming student filmmakers such as Tariq Mansor, Lauren Teo and other notable independent filmmakers from Singapore such as Kirsten Tan and Leon Cheo. The works selected for the channel offers a wide variety of genres from documentary ("Longest Distance Relationship"by Lee Sin Yee), comedy-drama ("The Lying Theory"by Lauren Teo, and “Move Out Notice” by Leon Cheo), to animation ("The Violin" by Ervin Han, and “Ways of Seeing” by Jerrold Chong).

As part of the partnership with SFC, Viddsee will also be commissioning their first original short film by a Singapore filmmaker, to produce a heartfelt Singapore-inspired story for a local and regional audience. The film will be released in the first half of next year.

Co-founded by the engineering and filmmaking duo Derek Tan and Ho Jia Jian, Viddsee- which has attracted over 500 million users globally- utilises data and insights to grow its viewership and to optimise content discovery. With its access to audience and proprietary marketing insights, Viddsee will leverage data and audience engagement analytics, as well as online marketing tools and strategies to drive viewership to Singapore films on the channel and extend their reach to a new audience.

Viddsee will also spotlight selected feature filmmakers such as award-winning local filmmaker K. Rajagopal, to further the exposure and awareness of their works. This includes customised marketing campaigns on Viddsee’s platforms, which will showcase the filmmaker’s past works and trailers of upcoming feature films.

The Singapore Film Channel is now live on www.viddsee.com/singapore-film-channel.
 
Some works on the initial showcase:
 
“Ways of Seeing” by Jerrold Chong
Rumble of train rails; Crashing of ocean waves; Soft caress of distant wind. Two people. Two ways of perceiving the world.
Accolades: Official selection at Singapore International Film Festival (SGIFF), Anibar International Animation Festival, Short Shorts Film Festival (Tokyo)

“Move Out Notice” by Leon Cheo
Wei, 21, has not clashed with her real estate agent mother for over a year since they started a new system – “talking” to each other solely through cheerful-looking notes. However, when Wei clumsily announces that she is moving out to live independently, her obstinate mother declares war.

Accolades: 17th San Diego Asian Film Festival, 9th Île Courts-International Short Film Festival in Mauritius

“The Lying Theory” by Lauren Teo
Set in a modern day local culinary school, "The Lying Theory" is a comedy drama between the world's most mistrustful girl and the world's most honest boy.

“The Longest-Distance Relationship” by Lee Sin Yee
Four friends laugh, ponder, doubt, and struggle as they embark on a journey to understand one another's religions and beliefs. Questions and conflicts begin to surface in their attempt to make sense of the existing diversity in religions.
Accolades: 25th Singapore International Film Festival and Awarded Best Documentary, 6th Singapore Short Film Awards

ShoutOUT!: 6 films to mark 16 Days of Activism against gender-based violence

$
0
0
16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence – that’s the campaign by the UN Women to galvanize action to end violence against women and girls around the world. It starts today, 25 November, the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women and ends on 10 December, Human Rights Day.

As part of 16 days of activism, UN Women Singapore is screening a total of 6 films on the theme of ending violence against women.

The screening event takes place at 22 Camden Park, Singapore 299814 (Hollandse Club)
Details on individual films can be found here:

25th Nov (Fri) A Girl in the River: The Price of Forgiveness

A woman in Pakistan sentenced to death for falling in love becomes a rare survivor of the country's harsh judicial system.
Facebook link
Registration Page: agirlintheriver.peatix.com


26th Nov (Sat) Menstrual Man

Set in India, Amit Virmani’s documentary follows the journey of a trailblazing social entrepreneur with an unconventional story. Menstruation is still a taboo in many societies, including India. The idea of a man converting this issue into a business, however, is almost unheard of. Follow the inspiring story of Muruganantham, a school dropout who realized that the majority of women in India couldn’t afford sanitary pads and decided to do something about it. The screening will be followed by an interactive session with the director.
Facebook link
Registration Page: menstrualman.peatix.com


27th Nov (Sun) Spilled Water

After having spent many years in the United States, Tchao, the filmmaker, returns to China to explore transformations in gender relations in her home country. Following the paths of four very different women, the documentary shows us the transformational role of women in a traditionally male-dominated society. While many of us have heard of China’s economic expansion in the past decades, where do women fit into these changes? We will be holding an interactive discussion following the screening to share our ideas on these issues.
Facebook link
Registration Page: spilledwater.peatix.com


3rd Dec (Sat) Playing with Fire

The film, directed by Anneta Papathanassiou, follows the stories of six Afghan women whose dream it is to act, an aspiration that is not only badly seen in Afghanistan, but also dangerous. Indeed, women in acting risk being beaten and even killed for being on stage, or aspiring to be. We learn more about these women’s ensuing battle against culture and tradition. One of the key themes explored in this documentary is the transformative power of art. An interactive discussion about the issues highlighted in the film will follow the screening.
Facebook link
Registration Page: playingwithfire.peatix.com


4th Dec (Sun) The Girls of Phnom Penh

This documentary by Matthew Watson explores the universe of young girls who are part of Cambodia’s virginity trade. Many of these girls sell themselves from a young age in order to support their families. A strong theme emerging from the film are the solidarity bonds that develop between these victims. Following the screening, we will be discussing the plight of women in the sex trade. Facebook link
Registration Page: thegirlsofphnompenh.peatix.com


9th Dec (Fri) OASS (The Dew Drop)
Abhinav Shiv Tiwari’s documentary follows the story of Kiku, an eleven -year-old girl from rural Nepal who is sold to a brothel in Delhi by an aunt, under false pretences that she will be acquiring an education. Faced with the harsh reality of forced sexual encounters and violence, we follow her quest to try and escape from her situation. A discussion on human trafficking and the issues highlighted in the film will follow.
Facebook link
Registration Page: oass.peatix.com

Reporting sick at The Armenian 'Film' Clinic @Substation

$
0
0
The people at The Substation were dead serious about the Armenian Clinic project if the facade of the clinic was anything to go by. They retrofitted the entrance in the likeness of an old-school clinic, with a glossy black signboard emblazoned with white lettering. Patients were required fill out a personal particulars form requesting for their ailment and allergies. A ‘nurse' in attendance donned a white medical jacket to complete the immersive experience. 

The Armenian Clinic was devised by film programme manager for visual arts at The Substation. Based on the belief that films have a certain therapeutic usefulness to our lives, the Armenian Clinic is a place where people who have troubles, especially of the more emotional and spiritual kind, can consult with a doctor and walk away with some film recommendations from the doctor. Check out our previous post for a primer on the Armenian Clinic.

It was too good to pass up an opportunity for free ‘medical consultation’ and such a novel new alternative to seeking chicken soup for the soul. Away from the SGIFF madness, I detoured to the more serene Armenian Street neighbourhood and paid the clinic a visit. 

My first moment of relief when I entered the consultation room was the strong air-conditioning, providing respite from the muggy weather outside. In a room thoughtfully furnished like a shrink’s workspace, with plants dotting every corner, the doctor in attendance was Elysa Wendi. In retrospective reading, Elysa is an artist whose works span disciplines like film, performative-act and mixed-media installation. She co-founded Cinemovement together with film producer Jeremy Chua in 2015. http://www.elysawendi.wordpress.com  But in that white physician jacket, she looked every bit the experienced, nurturing, motherly doctor.

But she is a hardliner with house rules. I tried recording down our consultation session and her sharp eyes recognised what I was trying to do and requested that I stopped recording before she starts the role play. Perhaps the mystery of the clinic experience is part of what would draw people to the Armenian Clinic, hence, the house rule.

In defending what I was trying to do with recording the session, our encounter got off to an awkward start. I had positioned myself as a ‘fake’ patient and Elysa was trying hard to salvage the session and see if she could making my time useful. We chatted about our favourite directors in general and she stumped me with the familiar what’s your favourite director and film question - a question that usually invites more than one name. But unknowingly, our dialogue drifted into our personal identities and outlook in life. That’s when I realised the I had spontaneously drifted into the desired 'patient mode' of discussing my needs. We skirted around several issues like societal pressures, expectations, life's responsibilities and death. On the topic of death, Elysa recounted a scene from Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu's 'Biutiful' in which he unintentionally caused the death of a group of illegal Chinese immigrants as he bought them a cheap heater. The bodies which were dumped eventually floated to the surface of the sea water and created a surrealistically beautiful moment. Indeed, films give us a chance to gaze at death from all perspectives. And surely, one can easily see how this leads to a kind of mental healing.


Unfortunately, I did not have enough time to 'heal' myself in the film viewing stations in the Theatre (there were three installed). But Elysa did write me a prescription to watch a few Roy Anderson and Inarritu's films. She also hinted at the possibility of reinstating the clinic for a second season. So do stay tuned to this space for more updates.

QnA with Producer Anthony Chen and Directors Shijie, Yukun and Sivaroj for Distance

$
0
0

On 27th May 2016, SINdie was invited to the Singapore Gala Premiere of Distance by Producer Anthony Chen, featuring Directors Shijie, Yukun and Sivaroj who were behind the short films that made up this omnibus. Here are their thoughts about the film and the process behind it!


ANTHONY


(From left, Anthony Chen, Bolin Chen, Yeo Yann Yann, Cheng Huan Lin and Tan Shijie)

1. Which came first, the idea of "Distance" as an omnibus or the directors?

The idea of doing an omnibus to nurture/showcase young directors came first. Then the concept of Distance emerged as we confirmed the directors. I came up with that as an overarching theme since the directors come from different countries so there is a physical and cultural distance between all of us. Of course the idea is to explore the emotional distance between people and in their relationships as well.

2. How did you also come to pick these directors, especially Sivaroj Kongsakul and Xin Yukun?

I have known Shijie's work for quite a few years now and have always admired him as a filmmaker.

For Sivaroj, I got to see his work before getting to know him.I remember seeing his first feature film, Eternity (Tiger Award for Best Film at the Rotterdam Film Festival) at the Singapore Arts Festival as my short film Lighthousewas programmed to play before it. I got to know him later on through Thai filmmaker Aditya Assarat.

Yukun was introduced to me through a film critic in China. At that time, he had just completed his first feature Coffin in the Mountain that was selected for Venice Critics' Week. I thought it was a real breath of fresh air, a new voice that differed from the young contemporary Chinese filmmakers coming out of China these days.

3. Were there any challenges working with diverse filmmakers?

There certainly were difficulties, since there are cultural differences between everyone on board. For example, in Thailand, the director didn't speak Chinese, so I was the one who had to listen to the actors' dialogue on set.

4. "Distance" was fully sold out when it premiered at the 2015 Golden Horse Film Festival. What was the audience reaction there like and did you expect it?

We had a wonderful premiere. And I was surprised by how everyone had their own favourite segments. Different segments spoke to different people depending on what they valued most - family, love, friendship, and also what phase of life they were in. 

5. The film has since been travelling around the world to Los Angeles and even Dublin. I am curious to know, were the reactions there similar to Taiwan or were they very different?

It's hard for me to know as I haven't been to those festivals. I'm just the Executive Producer after all. But I really like this little write-up from the Los Angeles Asia Pacific Film Festival about the film when it played. I thought it sort of captures the spirit of the film well: http://laapff.festpro.com/films/detail/distance_2016


6. Last but not least, you mentioned that you were writing a script about a Singaporean secondary school boy. Any details on how that is going and if there are any other upcoming projects you are working on?

I'm still working on tweaking the script and have also begun some initial casting. I can't exactly say it will surely be set in Singapore, but certainly in Asia. I am also developing two other English language projects (both novel adaptations) in the UK.

Director’s QnA featuring Tan Shijie, Yukun and Sivaroj
(Yukun’s answers have been translated by Sebastian Lim)


1. A lot has been said about what is it like working with Anthony. So I am going to ask something different, what is one interesting thing you have noticed about each other? Please try to describe a habit or quirk that they themselves won't know!

Shijie: I don't know if I he knows this about himself, but I found that Anthony comes to tears easily! (I think I can say this because I am this way myself - just not at my own work.) At certain points of the shoot, I would find him sitting by the monitor and sniffing, watching the performances. I found this strangely comforting, *laughs*.

Yukun: Anthony is sometimes very innocent, which does not quite tally with his age. His speech and actions would be child-like, which then requires any conversation or discussion to be carried out in a simplified, child-like manner. Otherwise, it will feel weird.
哲艺身上偶尔会有一种很天真的状态,跟他的年纪不相符。语气和举止想个孩子,如果此时你要和他沟通事情,也要把自己也调整到孩子的语气,不然感觉就怪怪的。


Sivaroj: He is a gentleman, I believe.

2. How does it feel to be part of an omnibus with the other directors? What was your reaction like when Anthony first approached you?

Shijie: In this particular case, the writers started film development together, in London, where first ideas were discussed as a group together with Anthony, so that there is thematic coherence in the stories from the omnibus. Also I knew from the beginning that my portion would be in the middle, and this contributed to how I approached the film as well, knowing the stories before and after. As such, on a conceptual level, there was a lot of collaboration, which was stimulating, and different, because I was thinking of what would come before and after my film as well. An interesting process.

I was naturally excited to be approached for this project, and accepted immediately; getting to make films is such a privilege so I felt like there was no other response. I was in a little bit of a dilemma, though. At the time when Anthony approached me, I had already committed to working on a film-set in China for 3 months. Given the Distanceproject timelines, I would have to develop ideas during the other shoot in China. That was tough! I was working on set all-day and working on my computer at night, thinking of ideas for the material in Distance. Tough, but extremely rewarding. And now there is a film.

Yukun: I was able to interact more with the other two directors during the scripting phase, allowing me to better understand and familiarize myself with their styles and habits. Director Tan Shijie left a deeper impression in me as a solemn, capable and experienced colleague. Though it took him longer to finish his script, every line and detail was carefully thought through. It is a pity that I was unable to learn from him on set during their filming as I was busy preparing for mine. However, I would find out from Anthony about the other directors. As expected, we all have our unique styles.
I loved Anthony’s “Ilo Ilo” and I feel that working on this project with Anthony would be a good experience and opportunity for me to learn and brush up on my skills, especially in portraying intricate feelings on screen which I feel inadequate in.
在剧本创作阶段很其他两位导演接触的比较多,熟悉了大家的创作方式和喜好。对陈世杰导演印象深刻,他很沉默干练。剧本写得很慢,但每一句都深思熟虑。只可惜他们在拍摄时,我正在筹备没时间到现场去学习。我会跟哲艺打听另外两位导演在现场的状态,的确每个人都不一样。我对很细腻的情感的影像表达并不在行,也想向借此向哲艺请教,因为我很喜欢《爸妈不在家》,就这样答应加入了。

Sivraoj: I'm honoured and glad to work with everyone in 'Distance' especially with Anthony but also working together with another two directors from China and Singapore. I don't only admire them because of their capability in filmmaking but it is in the passion and love they have towards the filmmaking that I feel connected.

3. Can you describe a moment or scene in the other two directors' parts that you enjoyed very much?

Shijie: I'll try to answer this that doesn't give too much away.  
In the first part, the protagonist meets someone from his past, who doesn't recognise him. At this point in the story, we know what sort of relationship they have, so their interaction is really loaded and I always liked this, even from the script.

In the third part, the protagonist, a professor from out-of-town, who goes on a small tour of Bangkok with a local student. We see bits of Bangkok and see the developing relationship between the two that follows naturally and casually. I enjoy this very Thai way of seeing love.

Yukun: I was exposed to, and understood the message and story behind Director Tan Shijie’s “Lake” in the early stages of this project, and was able to see the final script for his segment. Thus, I would picture the directions of the story in my mind. However, after watching the final product, I felt that Tan’s directing captured deeper, more substantial elements which better brings out the essence and intended message in such a short segment. Tan also made it a point to carefully connect the transitions, especially at the beginning and end of the segment. It is not easy for so many details and so much emotion to be packed in such a short film, but Tan did a good job.
因为陈世杰导演的第二部分《湖畔》,我从创作之初就了解到这个故事,也看过最终版的剧本。所以自己脑海里也会去描摹这些画面。但我看到成片后发觉世杰导演处理的更有底蕴一些,并且结尾的镜头也有安抚,在很短的时间里囊括了众多的情感和感悟是极难的,世杰做的不错。


Sivaroj: I love every time the walking-father scene appeared in the first part and every scene at the lake in the second part.

SHIJIE
You mentioned that you really enjoyed working with Chen Bo-Lin and Yo Yang, can you describe some memorable instances of working with them that you enjoyed?

In the film, they play very old friends that meet after a very long time apart. The scenes where the characters meet are sparse scenes with very little dialogue, but underlying them is a reservoir of feeling, under intense circumstances. This requires commitment from the actors, and they gave their all. I am always moved when actors put their emotions and put themselves in service of a creation, and in this case both of them gave very much, very generously. As their director, I can only be grateful.

YUKUN
Your first feature, "The Coffin in the Mountain" is noted for its relatively unknown cast. So what was it like to work with Chen Bolin who is an established actor?
I have no prior experience working with established celebrities. I was hesitant at first, but gradually as I worked through and discussed the script with Chen, I felt less worried. Chen is a professional actor who would go all out to play his character well. This pre-requisite allowed us to build up strong rapport and paved the way for the smooth working relationship ahead. During filming, when both the actor and director share a common goal of creating the best show for their audience, then how popular or how established the actor is does not matter anymore.
起初有些犹豫,自己并无与明星合作的经验,是对剧本的沟通让我慢慢放下忧虑。柏霖是个认真敬业的演员,会为了角色塑造做出极大地付出。这些都是我们之间合作默契,沟通无阻的重要前提。在拍摄时如果彼此合作的目的是塑造更好的角色,为了打磨出一部好片,其实也就没有什么明星之分了。


I understand that the film was released in China on 13th May. How did you expect the Chinese audience to react to it?
The Chinese market in the past two years has been more lively, but also more impetuous. Films on romance, comedy, and blockbusters on youths have all achieved impressive box office results, reflecting a solidifying taste for these types of films in the Chinese market in recent years. For the audiences that lack the knowledge in film aesthetics, more sophisticated films which focus on deep intangible emotions yet portrayed and captured in mild, subtle manners are likely to appeal less. Nevertheless, for the more experienced and more knowledgeable audiences, they should still be able to feel the filmmakers’ sincerity in bringing out the deeper messages of the film.
这两年的中国电影市场热闹也浮躁,各种喜剧爱情青春大片取得票房佳绩,让观众和影院的口味固话。加之新形成的观影人群对电影美学和类型知识的匮乏,导致大家很难接受一些表达含蓄,以情感流露为主线的影片。但是观影经验丰富的观众还是可以从中体会的作者的意图与诚恳的心态。

Finally if you could show this film to anyone, who would you show this film to and why?
Everyone! This film allows viewers to explore and consider the complicated emotions and feelings in life – subjects which we tend to ignore or shy away from. As human beings, how can we ever spend our life in solitude, without any form of social or emotional attachment?
推荐给所有人,因为这部电影让你有机会在影院里面对那些你不愿,不敢面对的人和情。生而为人,谁能真正的孑然一身无所牵挂呢。

SIVAROJ
Was this your first time working with a foreign lead actor? Were there any challenges in communicating?

I remember well how stressed I was before the shoot. I don't understand Chinese at all but when it comes, I go with it naturally. My eyes are on the monitor and the characters without being interrupted by the language barrier. Their emotions and expression are far more important to me.

Do you think any of your ideas from Eternity or Arunkarn have seeped into Distanceas well?

My first feature is Eternity (ที่รัก), I made that film with the feelings I have towards how much I miss my father who left me long time ago. For my second feature Arunkarn I have a strong interest in the moment before our death. The story is told through two soldiers. It portrays their lives before they die. 
After Distance, I shifted to the next chapter of my belief towards filmmaking, which is that I still don't know exactly where we are all heading. No path, no destination. Maybe we all just have a duty to be the best we can, I believe. 


*Responses have been edited for conciseness, clarity and grammar

For more information: https://www.facebook.com/distancemovie2016/
Photo Credits: Jenson Chen and Distance

Review - 'Lulu the Movie'

$
0
0
Michelle Chong’s third directorial film project, Lulu The Movie opened late November this year at Cathay. Centering around everyone’s beloved The Noose character Lulu, a parody of the stereotypical PRC woman, the audience follows her journey from China to Singapore in search of love. 

Disappointed by her online Brad Pitt (Chen Tian Wen) and hurt by his “twin” brother Leon (Leon Jay Williams), Lulu goes on a journey of self-discovery. From jobs to making friends and her newfound fame over a silly YouTube video, Lulu learns self-love and eventually finds the love that she wanted. 

From The Noose, Lulu came out as the popular character on the programme – beating Barberella as well as Xin Hua Hua. Known as hilarious and ridiculously embarrassing, there were plenty of expectations for the movie to be thoroughly fun to watch. 

And to a certain extent, the movie succeeded in the funny factor. The jokes and the puns ran throughout the film, and that kept the laughs going for most audience members. Even the comic timing within the film are pretty good. Some of the camera angles and fast switches on screen worked brilliantly too - enabling the jokes to come across clearly and effectively. 

It was also lovely that there were plenty of local faces in the film. From radio dj Glenn Ong to Night Owl Cinematics, they would appear as cameo roles within the film. That reinforced the familiarity of Singapore’s entertainment scene. Somehow, it was also nice to see these folks on the silver screen and working their brand of humour. 
However, the plot seemed to have lost its way after the beginning few scenes which was a pity. There was a build up on the blooming romance as well as love triangle between the brothers and Lulu. In fact, the tensions have only just begun with a quick introduction of Leon’s girlfriend, a snooty diva Sonia (also played by Michelle Chong). 

We were really hoping to see how the development of this plot would go as it seemed promising, however it was abandoned as suddenly as it took off. Perhaps this side plot should not have taken precedence in the beginning, if it was never going to last. 

Overall, Lulu The Movie was a good attempt at local comedy by Chong. Even though it could have done better without the repetition in jokes during the travel hosting segment as well as used the romantic side plot more, this is still a movie to watch if you would love to support the local movie industry. Also, there are jokes that only Singaporeans would appreciate. 


So, put on your leopard prints and bling, and get yourself to the cinema. 

Review by Dawn Teo

A Night that gathered the Best in Asian Cinema - 27th SGIFF Silver Screen Awards

$
0
0
The 27th Singapore International Film Festival (SGIFF) announced its winners of the Silver Screen Awards at Marina Bay Sands this evening, wrapping up an exciting year for the region’s filmmakers. This year saw 14 awards being presented, with the crowd-favourites Asian Feature Film Competition and Southeast Asian Short Film Competition awarding nine of them.
 
White Sun (Seto Surya) by Nepali director Deepak Rauniyar emerged as the Best Film of the Asian Feature Film Competition. Through the story of a Maoist who returns home to bury his father, the film trots through the scars that remain from Nepal’s civil war between supporters of the monarchy and the Maoist faction. The jury found it to be “an exceptional and incisive film about civil war and memory that encapsulates the never- ending conflict that is the state of the world today, with a message of hope that a different future for all of us can be possible through our children”. 

Turah (actor Ubaidillah pictured left), the debut feature film of Indonesian director Wicaksono Wisnu Legowo, was given Special Mention by the jury for Legowo’s “exposure of the corruption and hypocrisy inherent in our society through the microcosm of a small village, showing how the strong oppresses the weak, while never losing sight of the inherent humanity in all his characters”. Inspired by the lives of the inhabitants from a village in Tegal, Central Java, the film paints an authentic picture of the struggles of the lower class amidst corruption and indifference from the privileged upper class.

Bangladeshi film Live from Dhaka (pictured below) also clinched the Best Director for Abdullah Mohammad Saad and Best Performance for cast Mostafa Monwar. This debut feature film by Saad tells the story of a partially handicapped man who lives his days in anguish as he tries to find a way to leave Dhaka. Shot in grainy black and white, it paints a riveting and complex portrait of a man pushed to his very extreme and his struggle between morality and the instinct for self-preservation.

The winners of the Asian Feature Film Competition were decided by a jury panel, headed by Naomi Kawase, one of the most respected and adroit filmmakers in contemporary Japanese cinema, and a Cannes Film Festival regular. At 28, she received the Camera d’Or at the 1997 Cannes Film Festival, making her the youngest director to win the award. Other jury members include veteran Hong Kong director of the well-received film Ip Man, Herman Yau, Lebanese director Jocelyne Saab, and versatile Singapore actor Sunny Pang.

In the Southeast Asian Short Film Competition, Indonesian film In the Year of Monkey (Prenjak) by Wregas Bhanuteja (pictured below) was awarded Best Southeast Asian Short Film. The jury found it to be “inventive in its story and imagery” and “presents a dynamic new voice in Indonesian cinema that challenges social mores that is both eclectic and humanist”. Deemed to be “bold yet sensitive – sharp yet delicate” by the jury, the film tells the story of protagonist Diah who needs money desperately and seeks help from her friend, Jarwo by selling a matchstick for 10,000 rupiahs. In return for each matchstick bought, Jarwo also gets to see Diah’s genitals. The film also won the Leica Cine Discovery Prize at the Cannes Film Festival this year.

Singapore’s Liao Jiekai (pictured below) won the Best Director for the film The Mist, which features two women who recollect the sounds and images from places in their collective memories in this evocative dance-inspired film. The jury shared that Liao “successfully translates collective memory in a poetic way” through sound and image, “without falling into experimental film pretension”. Liao was conferred the Young Artist Award by the National Arts Council of Singapore in 2012.

Singaporean filmmaker Chiang Wei Liang received the Best Singapore Short Film for Anchorage Prohibited that features two migrant workers with no money and a child, and their search for employment opportunities. According to the jury, the film “shows the challenges of a day in the life of migrant workers without going into tropes of melodrama, with an observational style that makes the characters’ plight resonate”. The film also won Best Short Film at the Taipei Film Awards and the Audi Short Film Award at the 66th Berlinale.

Indonesian director Bayu Prihantoro Filemon’s directorial debut On the Origin of Fear (pictured left) was given Special Mention by the jury for its “existential exploration on the evils of humanity, brought to light in a surprising environment that makes this exploration even more chilling, with a gut-wrenching performance by Pritt Timothy. The short film is set entirely in an audio recording studio as the director pushes a soldier to the limit by taking on the roles of both victim and aggressor in a scripted anti-communist propaganda campaign recording.

The jury head for this year’s Southeast Asian Short Film Competition is Indonesian producer Mira Lesmana, who revitalised Indonesia’s film industry in the early 2000s and appealed the youths to local films. Other jury members include Programming Director of the Hawaii International Film Festival Anderson Le, and Singapore filmmaker Bertrand Lee.

Participants of the Youth Jury & Critics Programme, an SGIFF initiative to nurture critical cinema writers for the region, also selected this year’s Youth Jury Prize for the best Southeast Asian short film. It was presented to Filipino director PR Patindol’s first short film Still (Hilom), which was said to be “a delicate portrait that illuminates the strength of the kindred spirit” and “stands as a contemporary testament to the innocence of children and their resilience against the acerbity of adulthood.” The short film follows the journey of a pair of twin brothers as they find healing against the harsh landscapes of an island which is also trying to recover.

Two established Asian industry veterans were also celebrated at the Awards. Hong Kong film director Fruit Chan was presented with the Honorary Award this year, which recognises individuals who have made exceptional and enduring contributions to Asian cinema, especially within their own country. He received the award from SGIFF Executive Director Yuni Hadi, and Chinese actress Qin Hailu (pictured right), who starred in Chan’s feature film Durian Durian and won both Best New Performer and Best Actress in the 38th Golden Horse Awards.

With a career spanning nearly forty years, Simon Yam (pictured left) was also conferred the Cinema Legend Award, which recognises Asian actors and their outstanding achievements in bringing Asia’s story to life on screen. The award was presented to Yam by SGIFF Chairman Mike Wiluan, and Hong Kong director Herman Yau.

One of the region’s emerging filmmakers, Dong Phuong Thao from Vietnam was also awarded the Most Promising Project of the Southeast Asian Film Lab, an SGIFF initiative to nurture the future of Southeast Asian filmmaking. The project, Taste, features a Nigerian immigrant in the Vietnamese football league who has to find an alternative means of survival after having his contract terminated after breaking his leg. This was awarded after a six-day story development lab attended by 10 young talents and a pitch in front of an industry jury including Film Lab head and the face of the new wave of Indian Cinema Anurag Kashyap, and mentors – Thai director Anocha Suwichakornpong and Malaysian filmmaker Bernard Chauly.

This year, the panel also awarded Special Mention to Thai project Rahula by Puangsoi Aksornsawang. It explores the parallel worlds of the filmmaker’s father and mother – one surrounded by a dream life in the countryside, another living a metropolitan searching dream. SGIFF also presented its inaugural Young Critic Award to Eliza Ho, a student from Nanyang Technological University. The award was a commitment by the festival in acknowledging the contributions young writers make to the film landscape. Film writing is just as important as the films themselves to develop the industry. 


Yuni Hadi, Executive Director of SGIFF said, “The Silver Screen Awards is integral to the Singapore International Film Festival as we seek to inspire the discovery of independent cinema. Each year, we chart the depth of Asian cinema, and recognise our regional talents, including up-and-coming filmmakers, many of whom become prominent filmmakers of our time. Through the competition, we also pave the way for our region’s film industry and provide opportunities for its growth and sustenance. Congratulations to all award winners this year, and we are already looking forward to uncover more hidden gems of the Asian cinema next year.”

The Silver Screen Awards saw a total of 10 feature films and 16 short films, including a Singapore feature film and three Singapore short films vying for the awards. The glittering red carpet affair was also graced by Chinese actress and international film festival darling Huang Lu, Indian veteran actress known for her role in Bandit Queen, Seema Biswas (pictured left), and Taiwanese singer-actress Yu Tai-Yan. The SGIFF is an event of the Singapore Media Festival, hosted by the Info- communications Media Development Authority of Singapore (IMDA). SGIFF's Official Sponsors include Presenting Sponsor, Marina Bay Sands and Official Festival Time Partner, IWC Schaffhausen and Official Airline, Singapore Airlines.


@SGIFF 2016 Review - 'By the Time it Gets Dark'

$
0
0


Anocha Suwichakornpong's second feature,‘By the Time it Gets Dark’ is a mystical mystery that is haunted by the 1977 massacre in Bangkok. To unjustifiably simplify a complex film, ‘By the Time it Gets Dark’deals with a traumatic part of Thai history which unfortunately has been disregarded with apathy in its modern society.

This introspective and political film begins seemingly conventionally, about a young woman Ann, (Visra Vichit-Vadakan) attempting to make a film about the massacre, interviewing a surviving student protester Taew (Rassami Paoluengton) at a rural cottage, presumably in the outskirts of Bangkok. They go through the motions of an interview, digging deep into the past with flashbacks of the time when the students begin to question the authorities as well as having reenactments in the future. Thus far, the beginning is easy to follow.

Later on however, the narrative or plot, if that is the right term for this film, morphs regularly, turning and twisting. Ann’s relative failure in getting Taew to open up begins the second part of the narrative. Her mind begins to take over with dreams of a forest, a magical and strange encounter with herself and mushrooms. This leads us right out into George Melies’ A Trip to the Moon and a visceral macrophotography timelapse of fungi and it simply gets more and more surreal.  



The sudden use of different mediums is not the most jarring issue, however. It is the sudden abandonment of the main narrative, which may lose some. We take a sharp turn with Ann focusing more on her own supernatural abilities than on the work regarding the massacre.

We are left to wonder to our own imagination certain parts as we are carried away by Anocha’s ethereal and cosmic imagery. If you are able to carry on, the journey becomes wilder but if you are not, then the film will begin to fall apart for you, especially once the film recycles itself.

We are reintroduced to the opening scenes at the rural cottage though now the main characters have changed but yet repeat more or less the same lines. An echo of Apichatpong’s ‘Syndromes and a Century’ is present in this instance but quickly dissipates when it is clear the repetition is not meant in the same way.

In the midst of this, a few laughs seem to be readily available once we are repositioned into a tobacco factory and introduced to Peter, (Arak Amornsupasiri) an actor that partakes in an amusing music video sequence. Peter’s segment have little to do with the main narrative and is expectedly disconnected.



The only connecting through line offered by the film is through a magnetic young female character (Atchara Suwan) who changes jobs constantly and appears as a side character to many of the main narratives.  As a waitress, a cleaner and a monk, she is constantly apparent to the bigger stories and at the same time distant. This is a loose connection to the theme; a display of the apathy of young people towards historical and political events.

Regardless, the film remains engaging and beguilingly beautiful without any need for real answers. The surrealism comes to a climax at the end when Anocha transposes a montage of prayer halls to nightclubs to stunning digital effect and finally melting away into reality. The impossible idea of creating a historical film in the face of apathy ultimately consuming itself with a grand finality.

Ultimately, 'By the Time it Gets Dark' is a careful examination on time, memory, trauma and cinema. Constantly shape-shifting between fact and fiction, from rural to cities, dreams, reality and films. However, all these things have somehow been able to unite and coalesce  into a masterfully done reflection of a particular moment in history and its many rippling effects. 

Rifyal Giffari. Stills courtesy of LUXBOX

@SGIFF 2016 Review - 'Singing in Graveyards'

$
0
0



Bradley Liew’s ‘Singing in Graveyards’ is an existential drama with a twist. A washed up rock ‘n’ roll impersonator seeking former glory sounds like a cliché story in the same vein as Darren Aronofsky’s ‘The Wrestler’. However, this film is more creative and playful, blurring reality and imagination in every take, especially when you realize Filipino rock legend Pepe Smith plays the impersonator to… Pepe Smith.

Smith is instantly magnetic from the start till the end. Shambling around his house, as the penniless character Pepe Madrigal talks to himself as though he is actually Pepe Smith and eats nothing but chocolate porridge whilst driving a hearse. Everything about him is engaging and sympathetic as we follow his journey as he tries to write a love song for Pepe Smith’s comeback and play in the profitable opening act.

The real Pepe Smith meanwhile is derided in the film as an egocentric and selfish character, which is a crowd pleaser every time, particularly for Filipino audiences. Every insult Pepe throws at himself is a cue for boisterous laughter. Smith’s casting is also not the only hilarious meta-highlight. Renowned director Lav Diaz ironically plays a self-interested, money grabbing producer and actress Mercedes Cabral plays a supporting character as an aspiring actress who can’t shed her sexualized image.



Taken at face value, this film, complete with the estranged ex-wife and son characters, sounds relatively typical of the genre. However the film also avoids cliché deftly and adds a dreamlike fantastical element to its presentation. Time and space are compressed with creative transitions, where characters move in and out of doors to blur the lines between real and imagined. Much like Pepe’s own dreams which begin to slowly take a darker turn when confronted with present-day reality.

Oh and there is also a goat and a dog. Their roles in the story are best left unexplained.

Whilst much concerns Pepe Smith, one cannot avoid the intriguing characters around him, particularly that of Mercedes played by Mercedes Cabral. Whilst Pepe Smith dreams of being another person, Mercedes can’t get away from her past identity. She not only steals scenes at times, she almost steals the entire film when things gets explosive during a casting session with some sneering male filmmakers. Pepe and Mercedes story arcs twist and turn around one another but it is clearly Pepe’s story and we never fully find the satisfying ending scene you would expect for Mercedes after seeing all of her struggles.


But with a run time of 142 mins, some of the middle sequences do begin to sag and repeat. The man-child character Pepe plays almost starts to lose his charm. Yet with every scene more or less done in a single unbroken take with fantastic production design and cinematography, you can shed some forgiveness on Liew for finding it difficult to edit his own film. Overall, the film picks up again in the final act and gathers pace to a wonderful end.

The visually resplendent film provides us a character portrait that is full of ennui, sadness and humor of a man lost in past delusions, which unravels in the face of an unforgiving present. Bradley Liew accomplishes a magnificent feat in showing the slow awareness of mortality through playful inventiveness worthy of the legendary Pepe Smith.


Rifyal Giffari

@SGIFF 2016: Review - 'I, Daniel Blake'

$
0
0
2016 has been a year in which protests are filling up much of our news airtime, and the us-versus-establishment struggles have been played out in so many different countries. This makes ‘I, Daniel Blake’, Ken Loach’s latest film about a unlikely friendship between a single mother and a middle-aged unemployed man, a fitting Palm D’Or winner for 2016. 

Resting on a premise not unfamiliar to Singaporeans - going through an onerous application process, the film is a comfortably-paced expose on how difficult it is to claim assistance from welfare system, being a proxy for the establishment. Daniel Blake, played by newcomer to the big screen, comedian Dave Johns, is a carpenter who has left his job because of this medical condition and is trying to claim a sickness benefit from the government. 
The first 5 minutes of the film sets the tone for what’s to come in the film - we hear, over a black blank screen, Daniel being interviewed by a consultant, for a sickness benefit. The consultant insists he answers all questions from a questionnaire that seems to skirt round the real health issue. Point made. More to come.
The job centre where people can make claims for various benefits and get matched with jobs is a focal point of the film. It turns out to a sinister place, as the film portrays, where one seems to get a sense that the system wants to do quite the opposite of what it was meant to do. Staff attending to applicants hide behind legal terms and jargon to make the benefits out of reach. 

Tracking the entire benefit application process in great detail with a matter-of-fact gaze at the flaws of this process serves to drive home the point about how ridiculous the experience is. The epitomy of this is a classroom room scene in which an instructor tells the class why everyone needs to a write a good CV like it was a matter of life-and death. Another sardonic swipe at the system is illustrated in the digitisation of the entire application process to the T. Daniel, who bore the inconvenience of travelling to the job centre and getting stuck in the queue, was told, when he finally got to the end of the queue, that he had to fill up the application form online and no other physical forms of application, would be entertained. When his computer illiteracy was revealed, the film registered another new mark in its signature straddle between a wry sense of humour and utter frustration with the system.

Indeed, ‘I, Daniel Blake’, is a point-blank look at the hypocrisy of the welfare system that avoids sensationalism or heightened theatrics especially during moments of confrontation. Interestingly, it is not clear if the film’s manner of restraint is a characteristically British take on matters or a directorial stroke. But what is clear is the way the director has negotiated the key characters with the spaces, strangers and system. Ken has chosen to depict them in ordinarily mundane situations that are not necessarily cinematic, such as going through a job application. Yet, that 
ordinariness is pregnant with so much irony and humour. 
The job centre is also the starting point of another pivotal character in the film - Katie Morgan, played by Hayley Squires. Katie is a single mother with two kids, who comes to our attention because she was late for her appointment at the job centre and had to face the consequence of sanctions on her benefits. Financially squeezed out of London, she had to settle down with her children in Daniel’s neighbourhood in New Castle. Hayley slips into her role effortlessly as a frustrated and weary mother and delivered pitch-perfect method acting. On method-acting, she revealed in an interview that she literally starved herself in order to mentally prepare herself for what has become a rather iconic scene in the film - the Food Bank.

The Food Bank stood out in the film, especially for a foreign viewer like myself, for it being an elaborate expansion of the concept of a hand-out. It also stood out for being uncannily realistic. Interviews with the filmmakers online have actually revealed that it was a real food collection exercise in progress and people in the queue were real food seekers. Of course, one cannot forget Katie’s ‘show-stopping’ moment of ripping open and consuming a can of food on the spot, a very raw moment that gripped our conscience. 

Needless to say, Katie and Daniel got on comfortably, filling out the voids in each others’ lives. Delightfully, director Ken keeps their relationship ambiguous with Daniel being an empathetic, fellow-sufferer of a neighbour to Katie, though sometimes he goes up one tier, attaining a certain guardian angel status.

In fact, he really does become an ‘angel’ in the end, when almost at the finishing line of his battle with the benefits application, he suffers from a sudden heart attack in the toilet. Delivering an eulogy at what she called a ‘pauper’s funeral’, because they could only afford the cheapest 9am slot, she spoke about Daniel and his courage in fighting for what's right. The scene is stripped of any excessive sentimentality and Katie delivers the eulogy with a respectful sobriety, drawing attention to his life and deeds more than her own relationship with him.

Indeed, the film achieves its aim of being a quiet protest against the welfare system and succeeds because of its clear, microcosmic look at the experience of one person, without any attempt to magnify his experience in anyway. It's not David versus Goliath, just a small story about an ordinary man whose only weapon against the establishment was his spray-painted writing on the job centre's wall. Yet, like Daniel, who has earned supporters from the pub on the opposite of the road, this film has grown to be a ripple in a pond, drawing far greater attention to it than its unassuming form would suggest.

ShoutOUT!: A breathtaking 8-hour film is screening at the Arts House this Sunday

$
0
0
This Sunday (11 Dec) at  the Arts House, an epic eight-hour film will be screened. You read it correctly, it's eight hours. The name of the film is 'In course of the miraculous' by artist/filmmaker Cheng Ran.

After its world premiere at the 14th Istanbul Biennial (2015), and acclaimed screenings at Art Basel (2016), K11 Art Foundation in Hong Kong (2016) and various art institutions in China, this film celebrates its Southeast Asian premiere in Singapore.


Screening details
Date: Sun 11 Dec
Time: 11:00am – 9:00pm
The screening starts at 12:00 noon sharp.
Join us for brunch and conversation from 11:00am.
Light refreshments will be offered during intermission from 4:20pm to 5:00pm.
The Arts House Screening Room
1 Old Parliament Lane
Singapore 179429
M18: Some nudity and coarse language
Free admission Screening but tickets have to be booked through Eventbrite in this link.

Here is a link to the screening event.

Conceived as an experiment that challenges the viewer’s attention in the tradition of durational film experiences, In course of the miraculous is a film about travel, adventure and wonder. The work is inspired by three stories of real-life mysterious disappearances. These include British mountaineer George Mallory, who went missing while ascending Mount Everest in 1924; artist Bas Jan Ader, who vanished during his 1975 journey across the Atlantic as part of a performance titled In search of the miraculous; and the 22 fishermen killed in the 2011 mutiny aboard Chinese trawler Lu Rong Yu no. 2682. Using a narrative inspired by fables and mythic literature, Cheng visualises inexplicable or unimaginable parts of history.
 
You are free to exit and enter the cinema during the screening.
The film is presented as part of an exhibition called 'The World Precedes the Eye'.
 
'The World Precedes the Eye' presents the work of nine emerging and mid-career artists who are pursuing new thinking about matter in time, space and history. The artists form a wide arc through the Asia–Pacific region: from the western banks of the Bosphorus, to China, Hong Kong and Japan in East Asia, to Singapore and Thailand in Southeast Asia, and further south to Australia. Spanning sculpture, installation, painting, moving image and sound, the exhibition recognises that while matter, as a resource, is finite, there are material worlds beyond the boundaries of our current understanding.
 
The title of the exhibition reflects the swing towards new realism—the concept that matter matters—in contemporary art. Material experience rather than representation as a route to knowledge is central. The exhibition explores the idea that we share this world and are not its primary subject—the world is not constructed in our own image.
 
About the filmmaker
 
Cheng Ran was born in Chifeng, Inner Mongolia in 1981 and lives in Hangzhou. He has been producing film and video works that employ both Chinese and Western literature, poetry, cinema, pop and visual culture since graduating from China Academy of Art, Hangzhou, in 2004, the same year he began working with Yang Fudong. His art presents new narratives that combine myths and historical events. It is produced in the context of a rapidly transforming China, where the pace of social, cultural and environmental change is both largely driven and acutely felt by young people. His recent solo exhibitions include Diary of a madman, New Museum, New York (2016); In course of the miraculous, K11 Art Foundation, Hong Kong (2016); and Orange blue—in the process of a film, Qiao Space, Shanghai (2016), and YUAN Space, Beijing (2015). Cheng has participated in many major international exhibitions including Inside China—l’intérieur du géant, K11 Art Museum, Shanghai, K11 Art Foundation Pop-Up Space, Hong Kong, and Palais de Tokyo, Paris (2014–15); the 14th Istanbul Biennial, where In course of the miraculous was first screened (2015); When I give, I give myself, Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam (2015); 8th Shenzhen Sculpture Biennale (2014); West Bund 2013: A Biennial of Architecture and Contemporary Art, Shanghai (2013); 5th Auckland Triennial (2013); and 3rd Guangzhou Triennial (2008). Cheng has also participated in numerous film festivals. He has undertaken artist residencies at the New Museum, New York, and Rijksakademie van beeldende kunsten, Amsterdam. Cheng Ran is represented by Galerie Urs Meile, Beijing and Lucerne; and Leo Xu Projects, Shanghai.
 
Here is the film trailer:

ShoutOUT! The ciNE65 film competition returns 'Home' next year

$
0
0
In 2015, the winners of the third edition of ciNE65 were taken on a trip to an international film festival as part of their victory prize. Yes, they went up north to the Land of the Rising Sun, no less, to attend the Tokyo International Film Festival. 

You can be in these shoes next year. ciNE65, organised by Nexus, Ministry of Defence (MINDEF), returns for a fourth season in 2017, with the theme “Home • Truly”. This calls us to think about what makes Singapore a place we are proud to call our own. Director of Nexus Colonel Joseph Tan said, “Over the past three seasons, we saw many talented and passionate young filmmakers come forward to tell their Singapore story through thought-provoking and heartfelt films. We hope that the fourth season’s theme “Home • Truly” will continue to inspire more Singaporeans to reflect on their hopes and dreams for our nation.”
Colonel Joseph Tan Boon Kiat, Director, Nexus, sharing the theme of ciNE65 Season Four, “Home • Truly”. Photo courtesy of Nexus.

This season, ciNE65 participants can draw inspiration from the commissioned films of well-known filmmakers Sanif Olek and Wee Li Lin. Both filmmakers were inspired by their childhood experiences at the hair salon and, by pure coincidence, chose to set their films in old-school salons!        
ciNE65 IV commissioned filmmaker Mr Sanif Olek sharing his inspiration for his short film “The Usual” alongside Colonel Joseph Tan Boon Kiat. Photo courtesy of Nexus.

Sanif Olek’s film “The Usual” was inspired by his fond memories of his National Service days, when he served as a Commando in the Singapore Army. The film revolves around a National Serviceman who visits his childhood barber for a haircut, and who has flashbacks of his first trip to the barbershop as a young boy with his late father. Here's a compelling piece of trivia - Defence Ministe Ng Eng Hen makes a cameo in this film.

Li Lin’s “The Perm” tells another relatable story of the close-knit community that one experiences in old-school salons. In the film, a young girl experiments with her first perm, at a hair salon that she had been visiting since she was a little girl. 

Back to that prized overseas trip - winners of the “Overall Best Film” under the Jury's Choice Awards for both the student and open categories will get to go on the trip. This is on top of a $3000 cash prize each winning team will win. The Jury’s Choice Awards comprise eight technical awards each for both the Student and Open Categories. Winners in these categories will receive $1000 in cash and cameras. The Jury’s Choice Awards will be determined by a selection panel made up of industry professionals and the organiser. 

There are two other groups of awards - the Audience Choice Awards and the Inter-School Challenge Award. The Audience Choice Awards comprise three awards, and they will be determined by the total number of votes received from the public. The awards are for Favourite Film ($1500), Favourite Actor ($500) and Favourite Actress ($500).

The Inter-School Challenge award, in the form of a trophy, is given to the school with the highest number of quality entries submitted by its student teams under the Student Category. Only entries shortlisted by the selection panel will qualify for the award/s. An entry may be nominated for more than one award.

This season's judges include:
  • Chen-Hsi Wong (Film director and Assistant Professor, School of Art, Design and Media, Nanyang Technological University)
  • Edmund Chen (Director of Asiatainment and Asiatainment artiste); Jack Neo (Film director and founder of J Team Productions)
  • Jason Lai (Co-founder & director of content at Oak3 Films)
  • Jeremy Sing (Founder and editor of SINdie.sg)
  • Kit Chan (Artiste and creative consultant)
  • Lim Ting Li (Sound designer, re-recording mixer and foley artist of ‎Mocha Chai Laboratories)
  • N. Mohamed Yahssir (Film director and founder of Millenia Motion Pictures)
  • Sanif Olek (Creative director and owner of reel juice)
  • Wee Li Lin (Film director and co-founder of Bobbing Buoy Films)
ciNE65 Season IV will accept film entries from January 2017 to 17 April 2017. In June 2017, the public will be able to vote for their favourite films, actors and actresses via this link or via SMS.

In July 2017, the competition will conclude with an awards ceremony. Please visit ciNE65's Facebook page to find out more about ciNE65 Season IV.

Participation Guidelines

- Singaporeans can participate as individuals or as a team.
- Each team should not exceed six members, and must include Singaporeans.
- Non-Singaporeans residing in Singapore can participate as part of a team.
- There are two categories, the Student Category and the Open Category.

Student Category
  • Full-time students who are studying in a local educational institution at the point of registration, are eligible to participate in this category.
  • Non-Singaporean students residing in Singapore may be part of the team.
  • Overseas Singaporeans, who are studying full-time in an overseas educational institution at the point of registration, are eligible to participate in this category.
Open Category
  • All Singaporeans (including overseas Singaporeans) are eligible to participate in this category.
  • Non-Singaporeans residing in Singapore may be part of a team.
  • Submitted films must be original and should not have been previously submitted for other competitions.
- Each short film must adhere to the given theme and, after including the opening and ending credits, be no longer than three minutes in duration
- All film submissions must be produced in high definition
- All films must be submitted to https://www.facebook.com/ciNE65 by 17 April 2017, 1200hrs

And before you go grab your cameras, listen to what two previous winners have to say about why they took part in the competition and how life has changed after winning the competition.


"ciNE65 is one of the biggest film competitions to take part in. It’s a competition, as well as a good platform where you can meet industry professionals to learn more about filmmaking. As compared to other competitions, it’s a very holistic platform that provides many learning opportunities. Prior to joining ciNE65, I have always been joining other competitions to further hone my skills. After joining this competition, it has further encouraged me to continue pursuing filmmaking as a passion. I’m currently working on a long-form film which I hope to enter into more film festivals." 

Mr Lawrence Loh, Winner of Best Overall Film ('Unwavering' - film pictured below), Open Category (ciNE65 III)




"In 2011, this was one of the existing platforms for filmmakers to showcase their works. The prizes were very attractive, and I had set a personal challenge for myself to make my next short film. I had just come back from Australia and wanted to join a film competition in Singapore. I got to know about ciNE65 online so I thought, why not give it a shot? My agenda was really to prove to myself, my capabilities. Filmmaking is very addictive. My greatest takeaways from ciNE65 are the memorable experiences that the competition has provided, as well as the media limelight that it exposed us filmmakers to. I feel that the organisers have very good relationships with the industry and industry partners. It gives us good industrial and media exposure, and helps us get seen by more people, and land us our next job." 

Mr Ray Pang, Winner of Overall Best Film, Open Category (ciNE65 I)
Past winners of ciNE65 Mr Ray Pang and Mr Lawrence Loh, together with Mr Rish Tamilrajan (scriptwriter on Mr Loh’s team) sharing their ciNE65 experiences. Photo courtesy of Nexus.

Watch 2015's overall winner 'Unwavering' here 

Watch 2011's overall winner 'The Team' here 

Totally new to filmmaking and not sure how to start making a film? There is a series of workshops and seminars that will give you a crash course on making a short film. Stay tuned to SINdie for more updates on the sessions!

Wee Li Lin and Sanif Olek go back to their 'Roots' with 2 new short films

$
0
0

The hairdresser's a popular stop for movie directors, not to get their hair done but to shoot a film. The interplay of colours, mirrors, machines and clutter forms a richly textured visual tapestry. To complete the ambience, the hairdressers often come with over-the-top personalities. Think the musical 'Hairspray' or a dozen other 'chick flicks' where the female characters go to get their plot-pivotting transformation done. At the same time, hairdressers can be agony aunts too who are there to listen to your petty complaints about anything while kneading hard at your skull with hands full of shampoo lather.

Wee Li Lin's 'The Perm', a commissioned short film under the ciNE65 short film competition brings us back to these familiar settings. Guided by the competition's theme for next year 'Home.Truly', 'The Perm' explores the idea of a neighbourhood hair salon as a home, a sanctuary where the 'auntie' hairdresser knows you almost as well as your mother. A young girl experiments with her first perm (hoping to look like a K-pop starlet), at a hair salon that she had been visiting since she was a little girl. However the perm turns out very differently from what she had expected and she reacts with huge disappointment, only to be quickly coddled and reassured by her mother and the ‘auntie’ hairdresser.




According to Li Lin, the film was inspired by personal memories of growing up and spending a lot of time in old-school hair salons where the hairdressers who took care of her hair knew intimate things about her family and herself, and vice versa. Shot in a candy coloured palette reminiscent of 'Hairspray' the movie but in less neon-like pantones, 'The Perm' is an affirming tale about the concept of family and also growing up. To the young teenage girl, the salon is both a home and a cage – home because it is where she grew up with and she has become ‘family’ with the hairdressers; cage because there is a glitzy world out there beckoning to her to leave the ‘same-old’ and the entrenched. The film navigates between these two contrasting feelings, enrichening our understanding of the concept of home, that our relationship with home goes beyond a straightforward love. Because it is bittersweet, it means so much more to us.
Released at the same time as another short film commissioned under ciNE65, ‘The Usual’ by Sanif Olek is a companion piece to ‘The Perm’, as it is set in a traditional Malay barber. Take away the candy hues of ‘The Perm’ and the prettily framed mise-en-scene, add a generous dash of naturalism and an exclusively male environment, you get ‘The Usual’. The film strums up the same themes and metaphors as ‘The Perm’, that a home can be found in what is deemed familiar in your life. What’s familiar is of course this neighbourhood barber where Rosli, a young man was frequently brought to by his late father. Rosli feared getting haircuts but the barber always had a way to dispel his fear - stoking heroic dreams in him of being a Commando. Switching seamlessly between flashbacks and the present, the film stretches the boundaries of time in Rosli’s personal experience and also accentuates the fact that this barber has an undeniable timeless quality. ‘Home’ is after all always evergreen. 

Sanif’s inspiration for ‘The Usual’ came from his fond memories of growing up in a closely-knit multicultural community in rural Jurong, as well as his NS experiences. He feels proud to have served as a Commando in the army and the film marries this sense of pride with familiar boyhood experiences in the barber. Whether intended or not, It must be applauded how tastefully and seamlessly the element of national defence is being sowed into the film body and spirit, cos ciNE65 is a film competition organised by Nexus/MINDEF after all. And Minster Ng Eng Hen gets 8/10 for his cameo and delivering his only line ‘The Usual’ without sounding like a fish out of water. 


Indeed, the hairdressers’ or barbers often represent cradles of hopes and dreams and sanctuaries of honesty for many people. It is no wonder it becomes fodder for filmmakers. Here are some hairy tales from other local filmmakers. 



'Red Panther Barber Shop' is a documentary entry into the 3rd edition of ciNE65 in 2015 about a local barber shop, directed by Mohamed Ridzwan and Premnath Kulartnam.



Talk about making an entrance, director Royston Tan surely knows how to, with his glorious salon facade opening, tracked to the tune of old Chinese singer Ge Lan's all-time classic    不管你事誰。



Anthony Chen's epic Chinese New Year production follows the a barber through the formative decades of Singapore coming-of-age, namely the 60s, 80s and 00s. For the boys, there is no doubt that growing-up memories find a common home at the local barber's.

Written by Jeremy Sing

Learn more about the upcoming ciNE65 film competition and how you can take part, in our previous article posted last week. 

Boo Junfeng’s ‘Apprentice’ - One More Take

$
0
0
This review of Boo Junfeng’s ‘Apprentice’ is six months late, as some circumstances have led it to be so. But in a way entirely not pre-meditated, writing this review at the end of the year creates an opportunity to reflect how much this film has actually set a new bar for local cinema in a year of some very strong works coming from both commerical and arthouse filmmakers.

Perhaps the biggest achievement of the film is its ability to shed light on an inherently difficult and complex topic - the death penalty.  We have seen many variations of social commentaries taking oblique jabs at devils that exist within culture, societal values, family life and identity, with films like 'Singapore Dreaming', 'Ilo Ilo' and '7 Letters'.  But this film takes on an entire monster. It is virtually a risky walk down that hidden basement nobody has ventured into before.  Or put more accurately, it is something many people are secretly fascinated with but lack the courage to dig deeper. 

Offering a enlightened view of the issue of the death penalty and the process involved requires dogged research and maturity in storytelling. As demonstrated from his previous works, director Boo Junfeng's has a penchant for politically conscious stories and a level of understanding quite beyond his age. 'Apprentice' sits right on this same streak but edges much closer to that directorial pot of gold.

In a potentially polarising topic like this, the film shrewdly avoided sensationalising the issue or trying to coerce us into saying this is something to be abolished. It does what the main character, Aiman, does - walk a tight rope (pardon the pun) between hating the system and attempting to see some silver linings. 

Aiman is transferred to the death row section of prison unexpectedly, to be an apprentice to the executioner Chief Rahim. Being groomed for the job, he struggles with a few dilemmas, chiefly that of wanting to attain something within the system and dealing with the fact that his own father was being executed here.

In fact, characters engaged in moral rebalancing are found across the entire film. Rahim's former assistant Joseph is so guilt-ridden after an execution job that he decides to step down. When death-row inmate, Randy's wife refuses to see him for the last time, chief Rahim decides lie to Randy that his wife bought him a new set of clothes for his final day. Even at the point of execution, Rahim coos gently to heavily-breathing Randy, 'I'm taking you to a better place.'

So the film has all the fixtures that make the death penalty a spine-chilling and harrowing idea - dark corridors, stale-looking walls, heady sound design with a particularly prominent gate-shutting motif, families in distress, a mean-looking executioner and a graphic depiction of the entire process from leaving the death-row cell to the post-execution autopsy. Yet on the other hand, Rahim's little humane gestures, his explanation of how he makes the death painless, his disarming ways with the inmates during their final days, casts a kinder filter on the matter. The result is the kind of unsettlement you get when you see a farmer nourish his cow only to know that he will eventually take its life as well. 

The film hits the right note in sustaining this feeling throughout the film that something is right but wrong or wrong but right. Doesn't being emotionally straddled serve to edge our curiosity more? One must not forget that this is a psychological thriller and has been scripted in a way to tease and stir as much as to illuminate the issue at hand. And it knows there is more than a handful of people out there who will get a macabre kick out of watching this. 

The fact that news from the grapevine on current shortlisting of films for the Best Foreign Language Oscar has mentioned 'Apprentice' as a serious contender is no surprise. Like Anthony Chen's 'Ilo Ilo' (also lensed by the same cinematographer Benoit  Soler) 'Apprentice' is a highly polished as a piece of work. But unlike 'Ilo Ilo', this film has departed from the comfort of family chamber drama into the riskier realm of dealing with an institution. 

Filmmakers are meant to be like diggers. Finding a captivating story should be a substantial part of the journey, because good craft, though able to find an appreciative audience, can get forgotten but not a good story. 2016 has taken us through nostalgia with Jack Neo’s ‘Long Long Time Ago’ and Tan Ai Leng’s ‘My Love, Sinema’, a navel-gazing understanding of identity with Eva Tang’s ‘The Songs We Sang’, play-pretending with the cosplay-themed ‘Young and Fabulous’, mindless fun with 'Lulu the Movie' and an esoteric journey of the heart with K Rajagopal’s ‘A Yellow Bird’. While acknowledging the artistic achievements or creative geniuses in these films, we have all somehow seen a bit of these somewhere before. 'Apprentice' on the other hand comes freshly cut from a different piece of cloth, bold enough to be in a sombre grey-washed visual palette. The fact that December screenings at The Projector have been still sold out, is an indication that many viewers do have the hearts to stomach some discomfort to see something truly novel.

Review by Jeremy Sing

There are 2 upcoming screenings of 'Apprentice' on 26 Dec and 2 Jan, and previous screenings have been selling very well. Go catch it at The Projector soon!
You can book tickets via this link

STOP10 Jan 2017: 'Ways of Seeing' by Jerrold Chong

$
0
0
A recent addition to Viddsee's stable of films and part of Viddsee's recently-launched Singapore Film Channel is Ways of Seeing, directed by Jerrold Chong, whose CV includes an internship on the film Anomalisa.

Ways of Seeing is a visually striking claymation short film following two strangers who are visually impaired. The precise use of color and movement in the piece is powerful in evoking sensations as the two characters recount to one another their memories of their younger selves. One, a woman born blind and another, a man who loses his sight in his adolescence.


Whilst the visual design is evocative, it is also married with beautiful sound design and music as memories of the beach and forests are fully realized with sound through the stories recollected and narrated by the characters.

This study of perception and communication, told in cubist and expressionistic styles conveys touching emotions and a sense of mystery, as we are carried along by ideas and recollections of imagined and perceived sensations of its abstracted clay characters. A further charm is just how tactile it feels, going back to the glory of stop motion, with beautiful rough ‘flaws’, a stark difference against your calculated glossy Hollywood CG work.

Whilst relatively short, running only for 4 minutes, all of the elements in the film are still thematically focused and poignantly realised.

Director/animator Jerrold Chong graduated in 2016 with a BFA in Animation at California Institute of the Arts (CalArts.) Currently based in Singapore, Jerrold has interned at Zhao Wei Films, assisting on live-action feature films including Eric Khoo’s In The Room and Boo Junfeng’s Apprentice. He also interned on the Charlie Kaufman film ‘Anomalisa.’

Catch “Ways of Seeing” by Jerrold Chong on Viddsee.

Written by Rifyal Giffari

For the full list of January 2017's 10 films under STOP10, click here.

STOP10 Jan 2017: 'Move Out Notice' by Leon Cheo

$
0
0
Move Out Notice is a breezy comedy regarding the differences and miscommunication between parent and child. This film comes from one of Viddsee's latest selections under its recently-launched Singapore Film Channel, which is an online site that curates and distributes video content.

The premise of this local film is quirky, with two women - Wei a 21 year old and her mother - communicating primarily through brightly coloured notes. The opening scene quickly sets the tone as Liow Shi Suen playing the mother in the film, plasters her disapproving notes all over her house in scene-chewing pantomime fashion.



















Director Leon Cheo, who recently won Best TV Short Drama for his webseries ‘People Like Us’, directs this short which builds momentum quickly by playing on the fears of many parents – the inevitable maturation and departure of their child from home to become a fully realized adult.  On the flip side it also highlights the difficulties of being your own person in a confined environment living with a parent.

The film is a light, comical and somewhat insightful short of modern Singaporeans’ living frustrations though it doesn’t have any real answers for the real world and becomes distracted by a convenient subplot of a missing father and slapstick sequences.

Overall however the 13-minute short film is still a quick dose of fun with clear local flavor. So if you are looking for less serious art fare, click on this film over at Viddsee.

Leon Cheo is graduate of Chapman University with a BFA in Creative Producing, and Ngee Ann Polytechnic with a diploma in Film, Sound & Video, Leon Cheo is also an alumni of the Berlinale Talents (2014), Asian Film Academy (2013) and Tokyo Talent Campus (2012). He is currently developing his debut feature film, “For Adults Only.”

Catch “Move Out Notice” by Leon Cheo on Viddsee.

Written by Rifyal Giffari

For the full list of January 2017's 10 films under STOP10, click here.

STOP10 Jan 2017: 'Unlucky Plaza' by Ken Kwek

$
0
0


This January, pick up a copy of the DVD of Ken Kwek's Unlucky Plaza, a bold genre exercise of a kind rarely seen in local cinema. As I wrote in my original review of Unlucky Plaza, back when it opened the Singapore International Film Festival in late 2014:


Unlucky Plaza [...] sticks a cherry bomb in any notion that our fledgling Singaporean cinematic landscape has remained flatly one-note. Last year, Anthony Chen’s debut feature Ilo Ilo announced his deft hand at the patient humanism and meticulous detail of an Edward Yang or Ang Lee. With Unlucky Plaza, Kwek unveils his wholly different aspirations toward the dynamic frames, pop stylings, overlapping timelines, allusive pastiche, tense standoffs and irreverent humour of a Quentin Tarantino.


The film is centred on Onassis Hernandez (Epy Quizon), a migrant business owner who is desperate to keep his failing restaurant in Lucky Plaza afloat. He soon finds himself pushed into holding a property guru (Adrian Pang) and his wife (Judee Tan) hostage in their bungalow, only to find the police closing in.



Read on to hear more from Unlucky Plaza director Ken Kwek, whom we interviewed about the film when it first opened in cinemas here:

Unlucky Plaza says a lot of about the current social fabric of Singapore, what made you approach this subject matter in the way that you did with Unlucky Plaza, an ambitious and dramatic storyline?

I returned to Singapore in late 2005 after spending several years in the UK. I got a job as a newspaper reporter here, my first real job. It was the best way to be re-introduced to the city of my birth, writing stories about our politics, the way people live, the radical social changes taking place at the end of the LKY era. Unlucky Plaza is a dramatisation of those social changes, using a hostage crisis to explore the tensions between classes and the great cult and culture of money.


   
After you got the story, what shaped the film as the journey of making it began - the actors, the location, cinematic/directorial influences?

The actors – for me it always begins with the actors. I wanted time to cast, to develop a rapport with the chosen actors, to workshop and improvise scenes with them. Locations are, of course, important, as are the key creatives you pick like your composer, cinematographer etc. But if you ask me what’s the biggest and most consistent element that influenced the way Unlucky Plaza was constructed, it was the acting and how the actors played out their scenes.

How long did you take to develop the script? What were the challenges you faced in developing the script?

The script took about a year to develop and right up to the first day of principal photography I was refining the scenes on the page. Unlucky Plaza was a joy to write and the real challenge lay in convincing investors that I’d be able to deliver as a director what looked promising on paper.

There is definitely a style of comedy in your direction that is very daring. Tell us about your directorial style in this film and how it departs from Sex.Violence.FamilyValues.
Sex.Violence.FamilyValues was a satire, an attack on social prejudices and puritanical values. The comedy in Unlucky Plaza is used not to lampoon the characters, but to evoke empathy for their bad judgment. Their weaknesses are ours, too.



What were the biggest challenges you faced during the production?

There was a scene where we were shooting a public demonstration involving some 100 extras. The police, acting on a tip that there was a big, rowdy protest in Siglap, came and interrupted our shoot. The press came too. There was a stressful delay, and I was worried that the production would be shut down. Fortunately, I think everyone realised it was a big misunderstanding and we resumed filming after a couple of hours.
  
How was the financing stage of this film like? Did the ban on your earlier film influence the financing process?

I don’t think the ban on Sex.Violence.FamilyValues affected the fund-raising for Unlucky Plaza in a bad way. If anything, a couple of investors were drawn to the project because they liked Sex.Violence.FamilyValues enough to consider a stake in my first feature.

If there was a significantly bigger budget, how differently would you have made the film?

I wouldn’t. I’d take the extra money and make another two films.


How differently did audiences overseas react to the film compared to Singapore, where you only had one screening?

The audience in Toronto was fantastic and I think they enjoyed the dramatic elements of the story. Warsaw enjoyed the film’s dark humour. And Singapore audiences are quite naturally more interested in the social themes.

What's the best compliment and the worst remark you heard about Unlucky Plaza and why?

I’m not shirking the question, just adhering to a personal code that you can’t spend too much time thinking about what others like or don’t like about your work. You can’t please everyone, and sometimes negative remarks tell you more about the critic than about the film. I’m glad at least that people aren’t indifferent about it.












The DVD forUnlucky Plaza is now available for purchase at:

OBJECTIFS - Centre for Photography and Film
BooksActually
Books Kinokuniya, Takashimaya


Written by Colin Low

For the full list of January 2017's 10 films under STOP10, click here.

STOP10 Jan 2017: 'Saint Jack' by Peter Bogdanovich

$
0
0
Saint Jack (1979) by Peter Bogdanovich can claim the title of being the first Hollywood movie to be filmed entirely on location in Singapore. It was also famous for another reason - it was banned for decades by the Singapore government because of its unsavoury portrayal of the nation-state in the 1970s.

You can watch it on either 7 January or 4 February, as part of the Asian Film Archive's 'State of Motion 2017' (SOM) screening series of old films that present a side of Singapore we may never see again. As a savvy American pimp trying to make his fortune in Singapore, Jack Flowers oscillates between the hot humid world of the Chinese triads and the sordid opulence of his Western customers. Adapted from a 1973 novel by Paul Theroux, the film essentially depicts a man’s desire to forge a reasonably honorable life in a dishonorable profession.

Film and Screening Details
Saint Jack (1979)
Director: Peter Bogdanovich
Runtime: 115 minutes Language: English

Rating: M18
Screenings: 7 Jan, Sat, 5pm and 4 Feb, Sat, 8pm
Venue: NLB Plaza

Saint Jack is one of 5 films featured in State of Motion 2017.

The event opens 6 Jan and will go on till 5 Feb 2017. This specially commissioned event, presented by the Asian Film Archive, will comprise an exhibition, film screenings, talks, workshops and day & night tours of the commissioned artworks around Singapore. 

Participants in the upcoming State of Motion: Through Stranger Eyes will be brought on an art tour of film locations featured in these selected films where an artwork responding to both the film and its site awaits. There's more than meets the eye in the upcoming Singapore Art Week (11-22 Jan 2017). ART meets FILM - particularly those shot in post-independent Singapore.

We spoke to writer Ben Slater about 'Saint Jack'. Ben represents the 'authority' in terms of any kind of information about the film. He has published a book 'Kinda Hot', a book on the making of 'Saint Jack' (set in Singapore) and has also written extensively about Singapore films.

How did you come across Saint Jack?

I first came to Singapore in 1998. I was doing a performance theatre piece with a company called Spell#7. Part of the inspiration for the theatre piece, which is about a stranger arriving in Singapore, was Saint Jack. I hadn’t read the book or seen the film at the time. The reason it was on people's minds is because it had just been shown in the Singapore International Film Festival the year before in 1997. That was the first time that Saint Jack was shown in Singapore officially. So everyone told me about it and I actually had heard of the film because I am something of a film buff.

I had actually read a bad review of it in a film guide that I had, and got into my head that it wasn't a very good film. But now I was curious having been to Singapore and seen the place. I wanted to find out more about the film so I read the book because I couldn't see the film. There was no VHS tape copy and certainly no DVD of it. You know, I didn’t know anyone that had a copy so it was basically impossible to see at that point. All I could do was read the book and when the DVD copy was produced in America I ordered it from Amazon as soon as I found out about it. And then I watched it. I was working at the cinema at the time so I was able to project the DVD on the screen. And I watched it with my girlfriend who is now my wife, who is Singaporean, and we were amazed by it, absolutely blown away by it.

What is the allure of Saint Jack for you as a researcher?

It really came out of my coming to Singapore, visiting Singapore, beginning a relationship with Singapore. And then being obsessed and interested in film and bringing those two things together. I never looked at it as a researcher. Initially I was just somebody who loved film and loved this idea that this film would be made in Singapore with all these very famous people in it that nobody really knew about. I think that that began to make me very curious about the film and the fact that it was banned. It was very easy to find out, at least, the piece of information that the film had been shot in secret under a different title. That obviously made me really curious and have hundreds of questions about how they were able to get away with it and how it all happened. That's how I approached it, I wasn't seeing myself as a researcher but more as somebody who wanted to solve a mystery about how this film came to be.

What would you consider to be Saint Jack’s place in Singapore film history; is it an outlier considering the secrecy around its production and its subsequent banning?

I don’t think the film is an outlier because it was banned or because it was filmed in secret. I mean it is an outlier. If you consider it as a part of Singapore film history it's certainly an outlier mainly because it's made by outsiders and it's an outsider’s story. I don't think anybody would pretend anything else so we can't really talk about it as a Singaporean film in a literal sense. There have been those who have argued that it is kind of a Singaporean film in the sense that it was telling a story that was very specific to Singapore. It was also encountering some of the sort of censorship issues that are, you know, very specific to Singapore as well. 

But for me there is a tradition, a kind of parallel tradition of foreign films, international films, shot using Singapore as a backdrop or as the location. Saint Jack is the very best of them. You know, it really is. It's unique in the sense that it's the only one of those that I think really captures the place. The people involved in it spent time in the place and got to know the place, albeit not months and months but a reasonable amount of time. About 6 months actually. And I think if you're talking about the history of Singapore film, I think it’s important to look at Saint Jack. Certain Singaporean filmmakers have watched it and been aware of it and not necessarily have it as an influence, but something that they’ve liked and that they’ve been responding to.

What particularly struck you about the film the first time you watched it?

The thing that struck me particularly watching it was the fact that it was very obvious that there's almost no professional actors in the film. [Other than] Ben Gazzara and the 4 or 5 actors that played the British. Denholm Elliott as well. There are a couple of local performers who had some experience. But almost everybody else has never been in a film before, and quite a number people never acted before, certainly not on a professional level. There are some amateur performances in it, but nobody professional.

What I especially loved about it was the way that that was so seamless. This combination, what we called non-actors working with professional actors in a completely open, easy, relaxed way, often that can be a disaster. That can not work. And it's obvious that people are confident, or they’re a bit nervous or are a bit shy, and then the professional actors stand out a very different kind of way. But I don't think that it was the case with Saint Jack and I think it mirrored [the way] the whole thing had a very relaxed vibe to it. Like everybody was kind of having a good time while they were making it. And there was a very easy feeling between the local cast and crew, or those local cast on screen, and the sort of interlopers, the outsiders. It all felt very lived in, kind of real and textured.

Any memorable moments, characters or scenes?

There are so many memorable moments. I've watched the film dozens of times so it's really hard for me to pick specific moments that I love. There's almost something in every scene that I love because I've seen it so many times. I spot tiny details that other people might not spot. I can see the way there’s a lot being crammed into the film, a lot of moments and bits of information that are there and a lot of bits that are almost accidental. Bits of stuff that just happened to be around that they were filming, like a can of Milo, or the name of the band that was playing at the Hilton hotel that night when they filmed the sequence where they go to the Hilton. You know, all kinds of bits and pieces like that.

I think one of my favorite moments in the film, which is a kind of throwaway moment in some ways, is just after Jack Flowers (Ben Gazzara) has left Denholm Elliott's character William Leigh in the hotel room at Raffles. And there's a 5, 10 second shot of Jack walking along the corridor in Raffles hotel with the windows in the background that look out onto the harbour. We can kind of hear the boats in the harbour and it's around sunset time, evening. It's really atmospheric and moody. It doesn't advance the story any way at all, but it tells us a lot about the state of mind of that character and how he's thinking about life and death.

Favorite bits of trivia about the film?

One of my favorite bits of trivia about the film since you're asking, is when Pierre got hauled to the Ministry of Culture. They were panicking at that point because they thought, well that's it, they rumbled us, they know that we're making Saint Jack and we’re all going to get kicked out the country. And they just said to him: well actually, you owe all of the CPF money. They didn’t have a clue about CPF, no one had really advised them properly but they had been caught out. They were being put on the spot. They were given a huge bill to pay the government CPF for all the people who they employed on the film.

So they had to go and find a lawyer that could negotiate and get the money down, and tell them what was really going on in terms of what was legal or not legal about this whole business. And the lawyer was David Marshall, which seems kind of staggering to think that he would be the person in charge of that.

Talks

Join Ben Slater in his talk 'The World of Saint Jack' in which he shares more about the movie Saint Jack's fascinating depiction of Singapore and this world it has created for audiences. The talk takes place on 7 Jan, 3pm to 4.30pm at the Plaza, National Library Building.
Admission is free, simply register here: http://bit.ly/2i6Ogwf

Join Toh Hun Ping, founder of SG Film Locations, an online archive of all the films which feature Singapore locations, for a talk on Singapore in its various incarnations in films through the century. Titled 'A Thousand S'pores', the talk takes place on 10 Jan, 7.30pm to 9pm at the Plaza, National Library Building.
Admission is free, simply register here: http://bit.ly/2hnJpDb

Contests

We are giving away an copy of Ben Slater's book, Kinda Hot: The Making of Saint Jack in Singapore (Singapore: Marshall Cavendish, 2006), personally autographed by Ben Slater, as well as a pair of tickets to the SOM exhibition Bus Tour (worth $36)

Go to our Facebook page for more details on how to grab these giveaways.

Ticketing

SOM17 official website: stateofmotion.sg 
Follow AFA on Facebook for updates
Tour Tickets: som17tours.peatix.com
Film Screenings: som17screenings.peatix.com
#stateofmotionsg

Written by Jacqueline Lee

For the full list of January 2017's 10 films under STOP10, click here.

STOP10 Jan 2017: 'Ring of Fury' (血指环) by Tony Yeow

$
0
0
Ring of Fury 血指环 (1973) by Tony Yeow, can be considered Singapore's first martial arts action film and you can watch it on either 7 January or 3 February, as part of the Asian Film Archive's 'State of Motion 2017' (SOM) screening series of old films that present a side of Singapore we may never see again.

Inspired by the Kung Fu craze sparked by Bruce Lee in the 70s, Ring of Fury is a stylish tale of a humble noodle-seller turned pugilist battling against gangsters led by a man in an iron mask. Ring of Fury was famously banned for decades for its portrayal of gangsterism at a time when Singapore was aggressively ‘cleaning up’.

Film and Screening Details 
Ring of Fury 血指环 (1973)
Director: Tony Yeow and James Sebastian 
Runtime: 78 minutes 
Language: Mandarin (with English and Chinese subtitles) 
Rating: PG (Some Violence)
Screenings: 7 Jan, Sat, 9pm and 3 Feb, Fri, 8pm
Venue: NLB Plaza

Ring of Fury is one of 5 films featured in State of Motion 2017.

The event opens 6 Jan and will go on till 5 Feb 2017. This specially commissioned event, presented by the Asian Film Archive, will comprise an exhibition, film screenings, talks, workshops and day & night tours of the commissioned artworks around Singapore.

Participants in the upcoming State of Motion: Through Stranger Eyes will be brought on an art tour of film locations featured in these selected films where an artwork responding to both the film and its site awaits. There's more than meets the eye in the upcoming Singapore Art Week (11-22 Jan 2017). ART meets FILM - particularly those shot in post-independent Singapore.

We spoke to writer Ben Slater about Ring of Fury. Ben took an interest in the works of the late Tony Yeow and made a documentary called Tony's Long March about Tony. Ben himself has written extensively about Singapore cinema and is the author of 'Kinda Hot', a book on the making of Saint Jack (set in Singapore).

Ring of Fury is a homage to Bruce Lee martial arts films and follows many of the same conventions. Is its only claim to fame then that it was made in Singapore? Does the film have any value outside of simply being the only martial arts or kung fu film to be made in Singapore?

I think yes, it definitely has. It's kind of ridiculous that there hasn't been any film since then. In the last 10 or 20 years nobody's tried to make a martial arts film in Singapore. There have been a couple announced; at least 1 film was announced about 7 years ago I think. Once in a while, someone will say they’re gonna try and make one, but for me that's not really Ring of Fury’s claim to fame, as you say. That’s your really well made film.

The film that it often might be compared to is They Call Her Cleopatra Wong which was the Bobby Suarez, Filipino-Malaysia-Singapore co-production. Simply because they’re very commercial genre films, and they’re action films with heroes and they're kind of following it and ripping off previous templates of filmmaking. I remember thinking when I saw They Call Her Cleopatra Wong, it's sort of rough and clumsy and poorly paced and doesn't have the kind of zip and excitement you want it to have. It's not particularly well made. Whereas Ring of Fury is really stylish, kind of has style: really interesting shots and editing. It’s slightly outrageous and it's very funny. There’s a sense of humour behind it. It has a tongue-in-cheek aspect, it’s not pole faced. It’s not taking itself too seriously. And yet it's also got quite a watchable compelling story. So I think it has a lot to commend it, actually.

The whole fact that it’s Singapore's only martial arts film is just a pretty minor point, I think. It's more than that in the sense that it's an attempt in the early seventies to make a commercial genre film. It was kind of like other things happening in Hong Kong. And it didn’t work because it was banned, obviously didn't get a chance in Singapore. And I think, if let’s say in a parallel universe, the film had been released and it had been a huge commercial hit, there could have been 20 or 30 martial arts films that came out of Singapore. It could have, who knows, kickstarted a new studio or whole proliferation of other filmmaking that could have happened at that time. It's very very sad, in fact, in some ways a great tragedy that it didn’t.



Tony Yeow, writer and co-director of Ring of Fury had this to say on the “gangsterism” portrayed in the film: 'Filmmakers have a social conscience. When we see something happening, we have something to say.’ What is your opinion on this?

Tony, like any kind of film producer or filmmaker, was looking for things that were real, that the audiences would connect with. I knew Tony quite well and Tony was certainly very preoccupied by crime and very paranoid in some ways, when he was younger, about gangsters and crime in Singapore. There’s a story about him when he worked on Saint Jack some years later. It's 4 or 5 years after Ring of Fury that he was really paranoid about carrying the cash from the bank when they need to pay people. He really wanted to get out of that job. He did not want to be the guy that held the cash because he was so worried about getting robbed.

I think Tony was really aware about that being in an office in Geylang. He kind of knew what was going on, but I don't think you can take Ring of Fury seriously as a portrayal of gangsterism. The gangsters live in a night club and the boss has an iron mask. It's not realism. I think the idea of the protection racket and that being a threat to people was just something that Tony was tapping into, but I don’t think he had any great ambition to portray the reality of gangsterism.

What particularly struck you about the film the first time you watched it? Any memorable moments, characters or scenes?

What was memorable about it was the stylishness of it. The bit I always talk about is there’s a scene with a dog which I think is in this apartment with the villain. And there's a scene with the cameras at a very low angle. The dog sees the camera and it walks towards the camera, and it's absolutely hilarious. I remember watching that with a big audience, one of the first times the film was shown to an audience in Singapore in the early 2000s. And you know, it brought the house down. People just thought that was the most hilarious thing ever, and it's just amazing that Tony kept it in the film, it’s brilliant and so funny. It doesn't really take you out of the film. This a very cartoonish film in many ways, so it adds to the style of it.

The fight scenes are amazing because they are so raw, genuinely real fight scenes. Peter Chong (playing Fei Pao) is one of the most memorable aspects of the film. They found a guy who could do karate. He could have been a terrible actor, he could have had no presence whatsoever, and that has happened in other kinds of action movie projects where they’re looking for a new hero. But Peter is actually a really wonderful performer and very charismatic. You’re really drawn to him and it's a real shame that that’s it, that's Peter's only work on film ever.

Read our commentary article on the late Tony Yeow, following the Singapore International Film Festival's tribute talk on the filmmaker in 2015.



Talks

Join Ben Slater in his talk 'The World of Saint Jack' in which he shares more about the movie Saint Jack's fascinating depiction of Singapore and this world it has created for audiences. The talk takes place on 7 Jan, 3pm to 4.30pm at the Plaza, National Library Building.
Admission is free, simply register here: http://bit.ly/2i6Ogwf

Join Toh Hun Ping, founder of SG Film Locations, an online archive of all the films which feature Singapore locations, for a talk on Singapore in its various incarnations in films through the century. Titled 'A Thousand S'pores', the talk takes place on 10 Jan, 7.30pm to 9pm at the Plaza, National Library Building.
Admission is free, simply register here: http://bit.ly/2hnJpDb

Contests

We are giving away an copy of Ben Slater's book, Kinda Hot: The Making of Saint Jack in Singapore (Singapore: Marshall Cavendish, 2006), personally autographed by Ben Slater, as well as a pair of tickets to the SOM exhibition Bus Tour (worth $36)

Go to our Facebook page for more details on how to grab these giveaways.

Ticketing

SOM17 official website: stateofmotion.sg 
Follow AFA on Facebook for updates
Tour Tickets: som17tours.peatix.com
Film Screenings: som17screenings.peatix.com
#stateofmotionsg

Written by Jacqueline Lee

For the full list of January 2017's 10 films under STOP10, click here.
Viewing all 777 articles
Browse latest View live